We are now using HD-2 to
relay a second
program stream to two of our [translators].
We call it The Poor Man's STL.
I was surprised
to see the ample number of replies to my PubRadio post. At the very least, I’m
glad to start a discussion.
First, I learned
something today. I am a newbie blogger –
I started last September. WORDS MATTER. I’ve always known that but today I went over
the top saying HD Radio is DOA. Thank
you to several readers for making this point.
Please let me share some of the comments. Several
people asked that their names not be used. I’ve marked them Confidential.
Some people have found value in
CPB’s approach to HD Radio…
I don't agree with you that it
was a boondoggle. The HD grants assisted us in updating crucial infrastructure
that, with the subsequent demise of the PTFP program won't likely see
significant updates for a long time to come. I'm very glad we have those
recently updated transmitter systems.
A notable change in the recent
past is that a lot more cars have HD. Perhaps that's why we are seeing our WERN
HD-3 signal in Madison supplementing listening to AM 970 WHA, as do the two
analog FM translators we have in town. We are very glad that the FCC has
permitted translating HD signals onto analog FM translators, and AM signals
onto FM translators too, as we use each strategy.
In the case of WPR, we're seeing
AQH's in the hundreds and cumes under 6k for the HD signals. Those are
"real" but not large. That said, some of our analog stations in
smaller communities have fewer listeners than the HD signals in larger cities.
Mike Crane, Wisconsin Public
Radio
Some people think things are okay with HD
Radio now…
We've had success in developing
our HD2-Classical and HD3-News/Talk channels. Some of our members pledge
specifically to support these channels and we've distributed hundreds of HD
radios as pledge premiums.
Brett Tannehill
We have three HD signals and
listenership is good on all three.
Clinton Barrick
And some people agree with me…
HD is a
waste – the audience has spoken. Podcasting smokes HD...and that is the place
to put the bet.
Confidential
We did the HD conversion. It gave us a new
transmitter and allowed us to recycle our old one to another location for a
repeater. We are now using HD-2 to relay a second program stream to two of our
transmitters. We call it the Poor Man's STL. Now the [coverage area population]
can hear it on traditional analog channels.
Confidential
And, one person had a more
radical approach…
Actually, the best thing CPB
could do here (in my opinion) is to absolve granted stations of their
commitment to continue to broadcast in HD.
I consider the non-availability
of receivers to be a material breach of the reasonably-presumed terms of our
participation. To hold us to our end of the bargain is simply damaging
stations.
Confidential
Followed by a good
question…
I'm not necessarily against the
idea, but what, exactly, would you have CPB do?
Aaron Read
My answer:
CPB should start by acknowledging the problem. CPB needs to commit to
making better use of the digital broadcast radio spectrum. I still haven’t heard from CPB regarding my
question: How much money has CPB sunk into iBiquity and HD Radio? Stay tuned...
No comments:
Post a Comment