PACIFICA ANNOUNCES A
SETTLEMENT WITH THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING
The
Pacifica Foundation announced in a press release on Thursday (3/5) that a settlement
has been reached that will release WBAI, New York, from a court judgment brought by
the Empire State Building Trust (ESBT).
The deal also allows WBAI to exit the
lease for transmission space atop the Empire State Building as May 31, 2018.
Pacifica
is in the final stages of completing an agreement to relocate its transmission
facility to 4 Times Square, a site that will shrink WBAI’s coverage area a bit
but will cost much less than the Empire State Building.
Marc Hand |
Funding
for the settlement was provided by a loan engineered by Marc Hand of the Public
Media Company from the non-profit lender FJC [link].
FJC is a public charity
based in New York that has distributed over $400 million in grants to charities
since 1995.
According
to the Pacifica press release, the loan from FJC includes a reserve amount that
frees Pacifica from making repayments for the first eighteen months of the loan
and interest payments only for the following 18 months before the loan matures
after three years. The amount of the loan is not provided in the press release.
The
board also announced on Thursday that the search for a new permanent Executive
Director will start soon. The
ESBT agreement, the line of credit and hope that there will be a permanent Executive Director
gives Pacifica some breathing and planning room. But, Pacifica still is dealing
with a massive debt, dysfunctional management, listless programming and a very
negative public image.
Tom Livingston |
Livingston
is leading the Pacifica National Board (PNB) through a series of planning
exercises designed to get everyone on the same page. For instance, he is asking
members of the PNB to define the core mission of the organization. Does Pacifica exist to be the “voice of the
voiceless,” or to be the “voice of progressive politics” or does it super-serve
a specific community?
The
members of the PNB are an eclectic group of individuals with varying degrees of
knowledge about business, broadcasting and common sense. This is a tough crowd to lead because the PNB
is known for micromanaging, second-guessing and having multiple agendas. So
observers consider Thursday’s announcements to be a sign of internal progress.
EMF SEEMS TO BE IN DENIAL
ABOUT THE SAGGING RATINGS OF K-LOVE & AIR1 STATIONS
Alan Mason |
Our
story this past Wednesday about the poor performance of Educational Media
Foundation's K-Love (EMF) in the February Nielsen Audio PPM ratings was likely not
well-received at EMF HQ near Sacramento. Since we published that story, EMF
President Alan Mason has refused to answer or return phone and email messages.
We
were surprised by the number and tone of comments received from Spark News readers. The people we heard
from are not fans of EMF and their satellite-delivered formats K-Love and Air1. Readers were critical of EMF’s revenue ($177 million in FY
2016), number of FM frequencies they control (around 900), failure to work with
local churches and the fear that Christian Rock will destroy traditional
worship services. (Scroll down to read a sample reader comment.)
As
we said in the story on Wednesday, we have no animus towards EMF. We just want
to report the news about noncommercial radio.
The facts are that EMF’s formats are losing estimated weekly listeners
and we are curious why this is happening.
Our
readers reported a couple of factual errors in the story. First, we implied
that former K-Love PD Randy Chase was
no longer at EMF. Actually Chase moved into senior management at EMF – he is
now VP of Radio.
Second,
our chart of K-Love stations included
two stations that don’t air K-Love.
Instead they both carry EMF’s second 24/7 automated satellite fed format,
Air1.
We did research and found
more K-Love stations and we added a
chart for Air1 stations (charts on the right). The
trend is the same, downward.
According to Nielsen, both formats lost a lot of listeners
between February 2017 and February 2018. Five Air1 stations lost 20% of their estimated weekly listeners and 14 K-Love stations lost 19%.
We
asked a well-known media consultant and researcher, a person who has known Alan
Mason for many years, for his/her perspective. The expert (who asked us not use
his/her name) told us:
EMF is used getting
questions about their money, stations and agenda but I have never seen anyone
put their programming under scrutiny like you did.
K-Love and Air1 are Alan
Mason’s babies and he probably took your review of K-Love’s sound personally.
Also,
we received this comment from Aaron Read, Chief Engineer and Director of
Information Technology at Rhode Island Public Radio:
Aaron Reed |
I don't want to say
"K-Love doesn't care about ratings" but it's very, very important to
remember that K-Love cares a LOT more about donors in a region than they do
about ratings. Ratings are for selling advertising (or "underwriting"
for non-comms) and K-Love relies far, far less on that than they do on listener
donations.
K-Love's audience, reported by Nielsen, could drop by 80% and they would've care in the slightest as long as the number of donors (and the average donation) remained consistent. That's an extreme example, but it's quite possible for donors to remain constant, or even grow, even though Nielsen ratings are dropping.
With many of these acquisitions, they already had existing signals in the market. So they have an excellent idea of how many donors are in the market, and how many more they can expect to get with a larger signal. That's how they determine what these signals are worth; if the seller wants more money for the signal than the donor calculations permit, then K-Love doesn't buy it. So by extrapolation, you can be pretty sure that K-Love's finances are doing just fine with these new signals.
K-Love's audience, reported by Nielsen, could drop by 80% and they would've care in the slightest as long as the number of donors (and the average donation) remained consistent. That's an extreme example, but it's quite possible for donors to remain constant, or even grow, even though Nielsen ratings are dropping.
With many of these acquisitions, they already had existing signals in the market. So they have an excellent idea of how many donors are in the market, and how many more they can expect to get with a larger signal. That's how they determine what these signals are worth; if the seller wants more money for the signal than the donor calculations permit, then K-Love doesn't buy it. So by extrapolation, you can be pretty sure that K-Love's finances are doing just fine with these new signals.
Finally, a "Moment of Zen" from K-Love’s website:
WHERE IS THE PUBLIC FILE?
The FCC has granted a
main studio waiver so that the public file for each of the K-LOVE stations can
be found at: 5793 Skylane Blvd., Suite B, Windsor, CA 95492
Not all observers consider the $3.7 million loan a sign of internal progress. It was more like internal bullying. The loan was given with no apparent way to pay it back. Although all Directors had not even seen the final papers when the press release went out, it seems there is a hint that a sale or swap of a license is how they anticipate paying off the loan. This is not something the board can promise since the bylaws say that kind of decision has to go to a vote to the membership. Plus it needs approval from the FCC. Some observers wonder how this loan was even given since Pacifica does not comply with any of the financial provisions required by the lender.
ReplyDeleteThe CFO resigned when it was signed, his final day will be May 4 so he can make sure the outside auditor completes the FY2016 audit (due a year ago). The outside auditor said he would not do the FY 2017 audit, due to the State of CA by June.
This looks like a giant kicking the can down the road to me.
THANKS for this site, found via http://wbai-nowthen.blogspot.com that reprinted the above info. This is concise, perceptive simple writing vs. the verbose, rantings otherwise found, if any, about Pacifica's doing and failings, too.
ReplyDeletewe agree with your clear statements, and have said similar in longer form, of course, at
http://KPFKcommentators.blogspot.com - as we have been donors/ stakeholders since 1960 at KPFK in LA and very dismayed in last decade.
thanks