My post on Friday
6/3 [link] was accessed by more than 1,500 unique readers, a big day for my
very specialized blog. I received lots of comments, which I posted verbatim. Many
of the best comments came from folks who worked at NIS, NBC’s failed 24/7 radio
news channel. Here are some of the comments and further context.
JIM FARLEY
Retired VP of Programing
WTOP Washington, DC
When Jim Farley
talks I listen. I first met Jim in the 1990s when I was Director of News at PRI. Farley was a consultant during the development of
the program that became PRI’s The World.
Farley was considered as Executive Producer for The World. PRI missed an opportunity when they didn’t choose him
for the gig.
Farley was/is the
most influential individual in the radio news biz. He began his career in 1966
as a “copy boy” at 1010 WINS, New York, one of the pioneers of 24/7 radio news.
When Farley retired from WTOP in 2013, Jim Russell wrote a tribute to him on
his blog [link]:
Farley is known for his
one-liners that have inadvertently become his legacy. Sayings, such as, “Get it
right, then get it first,” have become the mantras of the newsroom.
“It’s what I’ve been
preaching: Radio is the medium of the here and now. You’ve got to reach out
through the microphone and grab people by the lapel and say, ‘Hey buddy listen
to me!’ It’s storytelling. It’s not reporting, it’s storytelling,” Farley says.
Farley was hired by
NBC Radio News in 1975 and was part of the team that created NIS. He was there
for every minute of NIS’s life. Here are Farley’s comments about my article:
FARLEY: Lots of inaccuracies
here. I was there from the beginning to the end. One example: According to
Denmark the NIS staff found out they were “toast” WHEN IT CAME OVER THE WIRES.
Ugh. Wrong. The announcement was made in the NIS Newsroom by NBC News President
Dick Wald.
KEN SAYS: Other folks who were at NIS at the time confirmed that what
Farley said is correct. My assertion that the NIS staff heard they were being
cancelled from the news wire is an urban legend. I have changed my original post
to reflect the truth.
FARLEY: That scoped version of
NIS was definitely not afternoon drive. This sounds like overnights. Drivetimes
and other weekday hours had dual anchors.
KEN SAYS: I stand by my assertion. The person who made the aircheck told
me he taped it on August 11, 1976 around 6:00pm EDT.
ANONYMOUS COMMENT
I apparently touched
several nerves with this person.
ANONYMOUS: The quote [that NIS was one
of the] biggest turds in American radio history should really destroy any
credibility of the article to start with. Who the hell writes something like
that? Compared to what?
As for the sound, it was equal to all
network broadcasts at the time, and yes, in just a few years after RKO pushed
everyone to jump into satellite broadcasting it would have sounded a hell of a
lot better. The idea that going young would have been better is just ignorant.
KEN SAYS: The comment proves that the “generation gap” is still with us.
The anonymous assertion that NIS was
equal to all network broadcasts at the time demonstrates why NIS sounded
like old-AM radio, one of its biggest faults. The creators of NIS probably
weren’t aware that NIS didn’t sound like what people expected to hear on FM
radio. In the mid 1970s successful FM
stations had a looser, more conversational sound. To younger radio people like me, NIS sounded
like it was designed by and for old farts. At that time, NIS was irrelevant noise to me.
The anonymous person who sent this comment seems to still have grudge because RKO pushed everyone to jump into satellite broadcasting and seems
to resent the fact that going young
was what established FM as the dominant radio platform. Roll Over Beethoven!
STUART CHAMBERLAIN
NIS Staffer & ABC Radio News Writer
& Editor
CHAMBERLAIN: I loved working at NIS (Jim Farley hired
me). There was one other technical issue that helped kill it. Just as the net
was about to break 100 affiliates - rumor had it that Westinghouse was going to
join us - NABET went on strike. Engineering was critical to our operation, and
nobody but the engineers knew how to do it. So the quality we delivered to
stations was dreadful.
ANONYMOUS COMMENT
I believe NIS was ahead of its time. The
daytime quality if content was outstanding. I was a radio news director of a
traditional AM station carrying NBC, but monitored NIS for hours at a time in
the Newsroom. The staff quality was high and the presentation excellent. Better
signals-and more of them--coupled with marketing money, might have turned the
corner. NIS was a well kept secret to most of the nation.
KEN SAYS: It was a “secret” because almost no one listened to it.
ANONYMOUS COMMENT
I recall hearing NIS on WRC in DC. The need
to share the distribution lines with the primary network resulted in this
somewhat ridiculous situation: When NBC news sought to broadcast a bulletin,
[WRC] would [say] “we interrupt our continuous news coverage to await this
special bulletin from NBC News.”
GARY KAYE
NIS STAFFER
NOW CHIEF CONTENT OFFICER, TECH50+ [link]
GARY KAYE |
KAYE: NIS was a challenging but
amazing experience for me as a journalist. I got to delve into topics in depth
in ways no other radio format - including NPR would allow. We produced thirty
part series on major public policy issues, case in point, "The Cost of the
Campaign Promises" in which we analyzed the economic costs of the campaign
pledges made by the candidates. No one did that. We did.
And yes, I was the editor on the morning
after election coverage when Dick Wald walked into the newsroom and tapped his clipboard
on the producer's turret, saying something like, "Boys and Girls, last
night NBC had the best radio coverage of an election since the advent of
television. But NBC is getting out of the all-news radio business." And
that was how it really went.
Hi. I enjoyed reading both the original column and this follow up. I guess I am one of those old farts that were listening at the time, and I was only 26 years old. I have been very interested in radio programming since I was very young. I enjoyed Monitor and ABC's conversion to the four network service in 1968. It was interesting to hear their continuous election coverage include exact timings for their affiliates to join and leave the continuous broadcast.
ReplyDeleteTherefore, even though I was sad that Monitor ended, I liked the all news concept and made it a point to have tape rolling for the first three hours of NIS. Of course, since the debut was at 3 a.m. local time I had to stay up all night to turn the tape machine on. (That included catching the AM transmitter being turned on.) I am also a jingle fanatic, so I enjoyed the pieces of music that was used for the various features during the hour.
So, the people my age didn't like the news format sound on their FM stations. The news format was what it was. It wasn't broke, it didn't need fixing. Just that the network O & O's didn't clear the service for their AMs. If only companies could have had multiple AMs back in those days. (I'm kidding.)