Maybe you’ve
wondered why some new songs zoom to the top of the charts and others languish
in “bubbling under” categories and then disappear. Of course, the appeal of a
song and reputation of the artist are major reasons why one song succeeds and
another tanks. But, inside the world of music radio, including noncom Triple A,
the number of “spins” as listed on airplay charts also makes a big difference.
Paul Marszalek |
You might recall
our post DO PUBLIC RADIO MUSIC STATIONS
HAVE A PAYOLA PROBLEM? published in May 2016 [link]. In the article we discussed efforts by Paul
Marszalek, a well-known and respected Triple A consultant and blogger who
publishes TheTop22 [link]. His blog post exposed pay-for-play antics and ways to distort the charts.
According to
Marszalek, some unnamed music companies are practicing a form of payola to give
their songs extra clout on music charts. He alleges that certain companies are
paying radio stations to play their songs. Marszalek says these songs are
frequently played during “lunar” hours. The goal is to increase the number of “spins” the
songs have on various airplay charts. This makes the song appear more popular
than it may really be.
Marszalek wrote on The Top 22
site [link]:
“Whether it’s money funneled
through indie promoters or the more legal demanding of time buys, a few radio
stations are engaging in the selling of spins…Multiple reports to TheTop22 tell
of a few radio stations engaging in, and there’s no real other way to put it,
pay-for-play arrangements.”
Ironically, it is
sort of legal. Payola is permissible if
the station acknowledges that a song is being played for “consideration, with on-air messages This
practice is particularly dangerous for listener-supported noncom stations
because they violate the perceived trust and integrity stations must have for
continued support.
THE BASICS OF “RADIO RECORDS”
Before we discuss
Marszalek’s proposed solutions, I thought it might be helpful to look at the
relationships between broadcast and online radio with music companies and
airplay charts.
Each week, most
stations that air contemporary music provide the number of “spins” (the number
of times a certain song airs during the week) to companies who tabulate and
publish the charts. For instance, I receive a weekly email from Brad Savage at
WAPS, Akron/Cleveland. At right is a
sample of his weekly airplay report. The top current release on WAPS, The Head and
the Heart’s All We Ever Knew, had 25
spins last week on Brad’s station.
Many music
companies want to have a comparison from an outside source. These companies subscribe to monitoring firms
such as Mediabase for airplay information.
Mediabase is owned by iHeartMedia (and iHeart’s bankers!). Mediabase then provides the information to music companies and chart publishers. The item below shows FMQB'S use of use of the data. The spins are on the right side of the image.
Mediabase is owned by iHeartMedia (and iHeart’s bankers!). Mediabase then provides the information to music companies and chart publishers. The item below shows FMQB'S use of use of the data. The spins are on the right side of the image.
Other chart
publishes get more creative. The image on the right is a Triple A chart
published by Billboard, a competitor with Mediabase.
Note that the “spins” are cross-tabbed with Nielsen Audio ratings data to provide an estimated weekly audience for each of the songs.
Note that the “spins” are cross-tabbed with Nielsen Audio ratings data to provide an estimated weekly audience for each of the songs.
SOLUTIONS-IN-PROGRESS
Marszalek is changing the way chart entries are tabulated for his charts. He wrote:
We have long felt that ranking
songs by the number of plays it achieves each week (spins) is a poor metric pf
actual performance.
In the case of Triple A, spin
count has become an especially
poor indicator of performance not only because the format is made up of a very
disparate group of radio stations, but because some labels have resorted to
gaming the system by buying spins in the middle of the night on small radio
stations (and one large one)
Beginning with this
week’s chart (on the left), The Top 22
is scoring songs not only by the number spins but the estimated audience reach
of the station.
Marszalek says the weighting eliminates the overstated influence of lunar rotation – no matter where they are happening or whether they are paid for.
Marszalek says the weighting eliminates the overstated influence of lunar rotation – no matter where they are happening or whether they are paid for.
And, to what affect? I decided to compare The Top 22 chart with two other Triple A charts (results below). Other than one tune, a new one from the Red Hot Chili Peppers, all three charts are remarkable similar.
No comments:
Post a Comment