For
the past several years NPR News/Talk KQED has been the number news station (and
number one overall) in the Bay Area. That status changed with the release of the
Nielsen Audio PPM ratings for May.
KQED had
taken the lead over KCBS in average-quarter-hour (AQH) share just after the
November 2016 election. They stayed in the top spot for over two years. (KCBS
has been the top station in estimated weekly listeners during the entire period.)
When
things like this happen, observers ask whether: 1. Did KCBS get better? 2. Did
KQED get worse? 3. Or are these two
stations so different that it is hard to compare them?
We
want to believe it is reason number three. But
without a doubt, KCBS is performing better lately.
Bob Butler |
Take a look at KCBS’s
website [link].
It is firmly focused on
the benefits for listeners.
KCBS has never been a “personality” station but
their new hires, such as Bob Butler, bring serious reporting skills and NPR-ish style.
Spark
News looked at the trend lines for both stations starting with PPM data from before the 2016
election.
KQED had upward momentum through 2017 and 2018, but things have changed more recently.
Both
stations had their lowest AQH shares in April 2016 but KQED peaked in April
2018. It appears that KCBS is peaking now.
In
the April PPM ratings, KQED’s estimated weekly listeners slipped to their
lowest level in three years.
KCBS also has lost cume during the same period.
KCBS's AQH is rising. That means the people who are listening are doing so for longer periods of time and listening more often.
At KQED, the AQH and cume are both dropping.
Maybe it is time to lift the hood
and check the engine.
Elsewhere
in the Bay Area there was little change from April to May for KDFC and KALW.
Meanwhile
Pacifica’s flagship station, KPFA, had an awful performance in the May ratings. KPFA was the lowest rated station in the market.
Here
are the May Nielsen PPM ratings for New York, Los Angeles and Chicago.
I have it on good authority that KQED does NOT run Voltair's PPM enhancement processing. It is logical that KCBS does, though I have no evidence either way. So the better question might be: how was KQED #1 for so long in the first place? And how much better might they be if they had Voltair?
ReplyDelete